Spatial Disorientation for Pilots Research Paper

spatial Disorientation for Pilots - seek Paper ExampleThree types of spatial disorientation occur in the welkin of aviation. Type I disorientation relates to when the airplane pilots do not sense any unusual occurrence. The pilots tend to be in a state that makes them believe in the normalcy of the aircrafts response to the required inputs. This results from the pilots lack of concentration on the primary escape valve instruments. Lack of concentration can be due to distractions that make the pilot shift attention to another source for a considerable tote up of time. Type II disorientation occurs when the pilot senses the existence of conflicting orientation cues. The pilot becomes unsure of what the flight instruments depict in relation to their personal interpretation, as well as what the out-the-window view signals. Such cases draw close when the pilots shift their attention from the flight instruments for a substantial period, or when they break from a cloud in an unusual p osition. In most of these cases, the pilot gets to control the aircraft or manages to access the help of another pilot. On the other hand, if the pilots fail to control type II spatial disorientation, the problem becomes more risky, trail to an crippling spatial disorientation, or type III spatial disorientation. This involves the awareness of the pilot of the conflicting cues. However, the state of the aircraft confuses the professionals, leading to incorrect adjustments. Making changes to the incorrect actions usually poses great difficulty, which makes recovery impossible in most cases. Research by the U.S. Army Combat Readiness/Safety Center further illustrates the prevalence of accidents caused by these trine types of disorientation. Type I disorientation poses the highest amount of risk, compared to the other two.This follows the fact that the pilots do not get to crystalize the potential danger, which means that no precautions take place to counter the hazard. Type III dis orientation poses a minimal risk, which means that most pilots gather the courage to correct anomalies, while a small portion fails to gather such confidence (Webb, Estrada & Kelley, 225).