Why do cannibals eat their deceased family Essay

Why do cannibals eat their deceased family - prove ExampleThere were two types of cannibalism exocannibalism (eating members of an enemy group), and endocannibalism (eating members of ones own group). Endocannibalism symbolized very different things reverence for the dead, an incorporation of the centre of the dead into living descendants, or a means of insuring the separation of the soul from the body. Endocannibalism is often associated with ritual sepulchre ceremonies and has been controversially referred to on occasion as compassionate cannibalism. Mortuary cannibalism has been considered to be the most widely secure form of endocannibalism, often excluding murder and focusing on already deceased corpses (Arens 18-35).Cannibals would eat their deceased family members to prepare qualities, show respect and deduct virtue of the deceased. There contribute been reports of such cases in Latin America, Australia, India, China, Papua forward-looking Guinea.Latin America. The War i (tribe on the territory of Brazil), prior to about 1960, ate as much of the corpse of a dead person as they could. If a corpse was too decayed to eat, most of it was cremated, which was believed to be weapons-grade to burial. For the Wari, allowing a loved one to be put in cold, wet ground was as tremendous a notion as cannibalism is to us. In various myths, Wari are told that hu valet de chambres are eaten as a step in a cycle in which humans also eat animals. At the effect when a body is dismembered, it was believed that its spirit was reawakened by ancestral spirits in the underworld (Conklin 210-234).A Mayoruna man once expressed a wish to remain in his village and be eaten by his children aft(prenominal) his death rather than be consumed by worms in the white mans cemetery. In recent times the Panoan, Yanomamo, and another(prenominal) lowland groups have consumed the ground-up grind away and ashes of cremated kinsmen in an act of mourning. This still is classified as en docannibalism, although, strictly speaking, grade is not eaten. The Yanomam mix the bones and ashes with plantain soup before consuming the mixture.The Cashibos eat their aged parents, further perhaps more from religious sentiment than from cruelty. Before their conversion, it was the practice of the Cocomas of the Hualaga to eat their dead relations, and to swallow the ground-up bones in fermented drinks, on the plea that it was better to be inside a warm friend than conceal in the cold earth. Theories that a lack of protein in the South American tropical forest environs stimulated cannibalism have not received support from recent studies showing that tropical forest tribes have a more-than-adequate protein intake and are successful hunters despite environmental limitations (Metraux 383-409). Australia. In Australia, cannibalism was mostly practiced to gain the powers of the particular person who was being eaten. Some tribes ate their enemies save, some their own people, and s ome both. When tribes ate their enemies, they and ate certain body parts, such as the brain, heart, legs, or tongue. The brain was eaten for knowledge, the heart for courage and power, the legs were only eaten in the case of swift runners, for speed, and the sweat and tongue were consumed for bravery. When tribes ate their own people, family members would eat small portions of plentiful from their dead relative as a sign of respect. Only people of worth were eaten. People who died of affection or